Re: [Salon] Wake Up Conservatives! Donald Trump Is Not the Second Coming of Grover Cleveland - LewRockwell



https://historynewsnetwork.org/blog/14240

Grover Cleveland: Defender of Hawaiian Independence




On Mar 14, 2024, at 7:45 PM, Todd Pierce <todd.e.pierce@icloud.com> wrote:

I appreciate Ronald Reagan for having retained enough of his earlier “liberal instincts” to go to work for arms control after The Day After opened his eyes to what nuclear war would mean for the world. But I spent 4 days in the Reagan Library Archives a week ago being reminded of how his fellow Conservatives thought, who so vigorously opposed any arms control with the Soviets. Or in the post-Cold War case, with Jesse Helms carrying on for the Dynamic Duo of himself and John P. East representing the Traditional Conservatives, with the latter having passed away, but with other Republicans led by Newt Gingrich and the Contract for America taking his place continuing the pro-war incitement of Republican Traditions, passing laws requiring the expansion of NATO, I can only ask in response to this absurdity, WTF? Which Stockman has a lot of, absurdities I mean, as a continuing Republican shill, even though this article is a must-read for what it correctly says of Trump! But not for Stockman’s constant shifting of blame for US wars away from Republican history. Which I know a lot of, having grown up in a Republican family, and becoming one for a while in the 1980s, in addition to extensive research in Republican Presidential Library Archives, and Goldwater’s, with his extensive personal correspondence as with Ike’s (Reagan being the only one which has personal correspondence controlled by the family, and not readily available to the public.)

"As it happened, the Republican Party of Congressman Howard Buffett (Warren’s father), Senator Robert Taft, Barry Goldwater, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan made worthy efforts to reclaim the mantle of Grover Cleveland during their time on the stage of American politics. But Cleveland’s only true heir in modern times was former congressman and presidential candidate, Ron Paul.

"And that crystalizes the irony and tragedy of the current insipid GOP hero worship of a man who is no hero whatsoever when it comes to the true conservative gospel articulated by Grover Cleveland."

In order: Robert Taft was a “China First Warhawk,” and McCarthyite denouncing any one to the left of Joe McCarthy as a “pinko,” Air Force General Barry Goldwater was of the same mind as SAC Commanders “Bombs Away LeMay” and his equally mad SAC successor, Thomas Powers, Gerald Ford went along with every war, and Ronald Reagan, before he sobered up in office, was sometimes even worse than Goldwater, on the Panama Canal Treaty for example. All documented in either or both of their respective Archives. 

Other than that, I agree with the rest of the above paragraphs. But not with this glaring omission: "Needless to say, the Democrats gave up half of Cleveland’s classic liberal legacy under Woodrow Wilson and his foolish war to make the world safe for democracy aboard and government hospitable to interventionist progressivism at home.” True as far as it goes, but omits how it was the Republicans raising such a clamor against Wilson for not getting the US in WW I immediately, in August 2014! And thereafter, until he did. 

Grover Cleveland was a Democrat, and an under-appreciated opponent of US Imperialism. Having been the obstacle to Republican annexation of Hawaii, as explained here:



"The Hawaiian pear is now fully ripe, and this is the golden hour for the United States to pluck it." The outgoing administration of (Republican) President Benjamin Harrison hurriedly drafted a treaty of annexation. 
Although ultimate Senate passage seemed a foregone conclusion, the Democrats delayed the vote so that incoming President Grover Cleveland could get the glory of adding Hawaii to the U.S. map. 
When Cleveland took office in March, however, he defied nearly everybody's expectations. He not only came out forcefully against the treaty of annexation but condemned the coup as illegal. He also called for restoration of the deposed Queen and reaffirmed what he saw as the American foreign policy tradition of non-interventionism. 
"Offered Hawaii on a silver platter, Cleveland stood up for principle and said"no." In 1898, he recalled "I regarded and still regard the proposed annexation of Hawaii as not only opposed to our national policy but as a perversion of our national mission. The mission of our nation is to build up and make a great country out of what we have, instead of annexing islands."
Cleveland held the line against annexation for the rest of his term. Meanwhile, the coup plotters, now shunned by the United States, had to content themselves by setting up a"Republic of Hawaii." Only in 1898 during the expansionist administration of Republican William McKinley was Hawaii incorporated into the United States."

That’s not to criticize Cold War Presidents, like Reagan, and Eisenhower, for how they saw the world during the Cold War, as my family did also, and I came to in the 1980s. But it is to harshly criticize right-wing historical revisionists who would have us believe the Republicans were the "Peace Party.” Which they weren’t, before the Cold War, nor after it, and during it, the most hard-right militarists of the two parties. No matter how much right-revisionists like Trump-sychophants Mollie Hemingway and Saurabh Sharma lie about it!

Wake Up Conservatives! Donald Trump Is Not the Second Coming of Grover Cleveland

If Donald Trump’s clean sweep of the GOP primaries is any indicator, then the cause of liberty, peace, free market capitalism, fiscal rectitude, sound money and small government is at an all-time nadir.

The Donald stands for none of these core values. Yet Republican voters have greeted him like he was the second coming— if not of Jesus Christ, then at least Grover Cleveland.

That’s right. These badly deluded people apparently believe that another Trump run at the White House in 2024 will enable the Donald to replicate President Grover Cleveland’s lone case of winning in 1884, losing in 1888 and winning again in 1892.

But here’s the thing. Grover Cleveland stood for something worth winning the White House to advance. That is, staunch adherence to the gold standard, free trade, budget surpluses, non-intervention abroad and a small Federal government in Washington.

Indeed, without welfare domestically and foreign wars abroad, Cleveland was able to leave the $1.62 billion public debt he inherited 25% lower at $1.22 billion when he left office. Classic 19th century liberalism was then in its heyday and Grover Cleveland was the closest thing to its living, breathing embodiment to ever occupy the Oval Office. And that was notwithstanding the fact he was a Democrat to boot, albeit of the old-fashioned Jefferson/Jackson kind.

Needless to say, the Democrats gave up half of Cleveland’s classic liberal legacy under Woodrow Wilson and his foolish war to make the world safe for democracy aboard and government hospitable to interventionist progressivism at home.  And the rest of it disappeared entirely when the greatest egomaniac to occupy the Oval Office prior to the Donald—Franklin Roosevelt–installed the permanent Welfare State and Warfare State on the banks of the Potomac during 1933-1945.

As it happened, the Republican Party of Congressman Howard Buffett (Warren’s father), Senator Robert Taft, Barry Goldwater, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan made worthy efforts to reclaim the mantle of Grover Cleveland during their time on the stage of American politics. But Cleveland’s only true heir in modern times was former congressman and presidential candidate, Ron Paul.

And that crystalizes the irony and tragedy of the current insipid GOP hero worship of a man who is no hero whatsoever when it comes to the true conservative gospel articulated by Grover Cleveland.

To the contrary, Donald Trump is the opposite of Ron Paul—a veritable anti-Grover Cleveland. That is, an egomaniacal big government Ceasarist who peddles a dog’s breakfast of protectionism, nativism, law and order demagoguery, monetary crankery worthy of William Jennings Bryan and fiscal profligacy that puts FDR, LBJ and Barrack Obama to shame.

Worse still, the foundation of his menacing brew of anti-liberty bromides, shibboleths and dime-store patriotism is an infantile egotism and obsession with “winning” that should leave any adult citizen—conservative or otherwise—cringing, if not downright nauseated.

After all, upon single-handedly losing the US House in 2018 and the presidency and Senate in 2020, what even minimally self-aware politician would greet the CPAC conference as the Donald did in February 2021 with these words?

Slobbering all over the flag upon taking the podium, he blurted out—

“Hello CPAC Do you miss me yet?” Mr. Trump said. “Do you miss me?”

Of course, the Donald was just getting started. After pages and pages of semi-coherent blather about immigration, trade wars and his alleged victories over both Biden and the Covid (via dangerously rushed to market vaccines), the Donald let loose a word salad of pure Ceasarist self-adulation:

Thank you. Thank you very much. So nice. I started that hearing, we really where … we’re getting word of that, hearing that during some of the rallies, especially the latter rallies where we set records. We had 56 unbelievable packed rallies. And nobody’s ever had anything that we had. And we started hearing, “We love you.”

And I asked somebody because we really like Ronald Reagan, right? He was a great president. We had others. But I said, “Did anybody ever say that to Ronald Reagan …

Needless to say, we knew Ronald Reagan. Not in a million years would that deeply principled and deeply humble man have uttered such narcissistic dumbassery.

Yes, the 2020 national election was probably the worst ever conducted in the US owing to the state- and locality-run electoral system’s complete unreadiness to handle 65 million mail-in ballots out of more than 155 million votes cast. And undoubtedly the incidence of inappropriately tabulated ballots exceeded even the 1960 election when the Democrats were helped by an unusually large turnout in Chicago’s Grant Park Cemetery and 95:5 vote pluralities in the far-flung precincts of Texas, which were bought and paid for by Lyndon Johnson’s operatives.

Still, Trump did lose the popular vote by 8 million. And he did lose 37 votes in the Electoral College (and therefore the election) by a total of just 42,900 out of nearly 12 million votes cast in the states of Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin.

Yet he found no way to effectively contest these outcomes even though there were Republican governors, secretaries of state and legislatures in Arizona and Georgia and no serious claims that the Dem’s fiddled with the election rules and machinery in Wisconsin.

So by February 2021—to say nothing of March 2024—Walter Mondale’s famous slogan from the 1984 election about “where’s the beef” has become dispositive. But that hasn’t interfered with the Donald’s same old megalomaniacal bluster that issued until his very last day in the White House. Expressing himself at a level of verbal incoherence that would be hard to match even in the typical seventh grade English class (where it is still taught) he later told CPAC:

Actually, as you know, they (the Dems) just lost the white house, but it’s one of those. But who knows? Who knows, I may even decide to beat them for a third time, okay……

In the history of our country, (corruption) has taken place for years in Pennsylvania and Detroit and various other places. But there’s tremendous, never like this, because they used COVID as a way of cheating. That’s what happened. And everybody knows it. Hundreds of thousands and millions of ballots……

Our election process is worse than that in many cases of a third world country. You know that, you saw what was going on. Even if you consider nothing else, it is undeniable that election rules were illegally changed at the last minute in almost every swing state with the procedures rewritten by local politicians … you’re not allowed to do that … and local judges. They want more time, they want this, they want that. All done by local politicians or local judges, as opposed to state legislatures as required by the Constitution of the United States.

And these are just numbers that are massive. These aren’t little numbers; these are numbers that in each state is a transformative number. It changes the outcome of the election. And it’s not close…. And the supreme court, again, didn’t have the guts or the courage to do anything about it.

Fewer more dangerous words than the last bolded sentence have ever been spoken by an American politician, let alone one who claims the mantle of conservative leadership. Make the Supreme Court, rather than the states and their voters, the arbiter of American presidential elections—thereby institutionalizing the mistake of 2000—and the Founders’ finely wrought machinery of democratic governance will be soon heading for the dustbin of history.

Nevertheless, having claimed to have won an election that the practical machinery of the American electoral process in the end said he lost, the Donald then let loose with a barrage of bile, braggadocio and babble on that CPAC conference occasion that is just plain insensible. And it hasn’t stopped for a moment during the three years since then.

Contrary to his delusional claims, the Donald did not start a popular uprising around principles and purposes that transcend his own cult of personality. He only rubbed raw popular discontent with the reigning liberal ruling class without offering any remedies at all, or even a future blueprint capable of ameliorating their own valid economic grievances.

Again, the level of verbal incoherence is one for the record books:

And for us, it’s our movement. As I said, a movement, like has never been seen. I think we can probably say, never been seen anywhere in the world. And nobody’s ever seen a movement like this. I’d grow out and I’d watch somebody who came in second in New Hampshire or first in Iowa and that was the end and they became famous for the rest of their lives. We won the election twice. I mean you know think about it. The task for our movement and our party is to stand up to this destructive agenda with confidence and with resolve… That’s why the party is growing so rapidly and is becoming a different party. And it’s becoming a party of love. You have to see outside the streets. I mean, there’s such love. The flags … Amazing.

Thereafter came a recitation of the Greatest Economy Ever myth and the delusions of grandeur in which it is embedded.

But this gets to the meat of the matter. The GOP is supposed to be the guardian of the preconditions for capitalist prosperity and sustainably rising wealth and living standards. These key enablers include sound money, fiscal rectitude and minimum intervention by the state’s regulatory and police powers.

None of those things got the time of day during the Donald’s tenure. The great economic successes he claimed to the CPAC convocation were nothing more than the business cycle reaching its peak about one year before the end of his term—-a peak that was weak by all historical standards. And, in any event, it was the work of tens of millions of workers and businesses on the free market, not anything which emanated from the Oval Office.

Over the past four years my administration delivered for Americans of all backgrounds like never before, like never before. We built the strongest economy in the history of the world, raised wages, and achieved the lowest African American, Hispanic American, Asian American unemployment rates ever, ever, ever recorded. It was so great for everybody of all backgrounds that even after the China virus, we are leading the world, nobody’s even close. We’re leading it in the comeback. Our economic comeback has been incredible. That’s because the financial and economic foundation we built was so strong that unlike other countries, who are having a hard time, we didn’t break. We came roaring back and now our stock market and your 401ks are again at record levels, higher than ever before actually.

The fact is, presidential terms and the business cycle do not coincide and in the era of massive money-printing by the central bank and the resulting destruction of honest price discovery on Wall Street, the stock indices measure little more than the egregious financial bubbles emanating from the Eccles Building.

Still, while the Donald is obsessed by his own scoreboards, even they do not prove what he claims. That’s especially the case when you don’t let him off the hook owing to the deep economic setbacks of 2020.

After all, it was not the Covid-19 which clobbered the US economy. The culprit was government ordered Lockdowns—a folly that rose directly from Donald Trump’s panicked actions in March 2020.

It was Trump who called for the original economy- and liberty-killing stay-at-home mandates. And it was Trump who unleashed Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx, the CDC, the White House Coronavirus Task Force and the rest of the Virus Patrol to wreak havoc with normal economic function and to foster a level of public hysteria wholly unwarranted by the actual facts of the disease.

In fact, after an entire year of unprecedented emergency conditions during 2020, the Covid had generated CFRs (fatality rates among those infected by the disease whether sick or symptomatic or not) that were only slightly higher than those calculated by the CDC for the influenza seasons of 2017-2018.  Among the non-elderly, the CFRs are virtually identical as shown below.

That gets us to the bottom line. The truth of the matter is that the real GDP growth rate during the Donald’s term was the absolute lowest of any presidential term since 1950, and by a country mile in virtually all cases. The Greatest Economy Ever claim just doesn’t have a leg to stand on.

Real GDP Growth Per Annum During Presidential Terms Since 1950:

  • Eisenhower (1953-1960): 2.52%.
  • Kennedy-Johnson (1961-1968: 5.19%.
  • Nixon-Ford (1969-1967: 2.73%.
  • Carter (1977-1980): 3.19%.
  • Reagan (1981-1988): 3.55%.
  • Bush the Elder (1989-1992): 2.21%.
  • Clinton (1992-2000): 3.81%.
  • Bush the Younger (2001-2008): 1.75%.
  • Obama (2009-2016): 1.94%.
  • Trump (2017-2020): 1.25%.

Of course, what the Donald did excel at was running up the Federal debt like never before. Even compared to the previous three big spenders in the Oval Office, the Donald won the prize for shackling future taxpayers, born and unborn, with heretofore unimaginable amounts of new debt:

Average Annual Increase in the Public Debt:

  • Clinton: $203 billion.
  • Bush: $655 billion.
  • Obama: $1.132 trillion.
  • Trump: $2.334 trillion.

Likewise, the modern Fed needs no encouragement from the White House to expand its balance sheet aggressively and thereby pump fiat credit into the canyons of Wall Street, where it mostly lingers to inflate the prices of financial assets skyward.

But in the Donald’s case, he not only encouraged a reckless rate of money-pumping from the Eccles Building; he demanded it in relentless, bully-boy fashion.

Accordingly, the data below is the true skunk on the wood pile. At the end of the day, sound money is the sine qua non of capitalist prosperity, and the GOP is its designated watchman in the context of America’s two-party democracy.

On that score the Donald failed miserably.

Per Annum Change in the Fed’s Balance Sheet, 2000-2020:

  • Bush (2001-2008): $185 billion.
  • Obama (2009-2016): $295 billion.
  • Trump (2017-2020): $750 billion.

Even on the matter of the Forever Wars, which the Donald at least verbally condemned while he was in office, he couldn’t leave well enough alone. Cancellation of the Iranian nuke deal was a screaming error. Yet that foolish action did more to keep the Warfare State in business than all of his verbal jousting with the interventionists follies of his predecessors combined.

Actually, Iran’s tiny $25 billion defense budget, which amounts to just 2.7% of the Pentagon’s massive haul, is no threat to the American homeland whatsoever. They Iranian/Shiite side of the age-old Islamic schism has never launched an attack upon or even threatened American soil. That was the work of their bitter enemies on the Sunni side of the aisle—enemies that were more often than not financed and sanctioned by Washington’s so-called allies in the region.

Moreover, even the official NIEs (national intelligence estimates) of the nation’s 17 intelligence agencies have conceded that beyond a small research program abandoned in 2003, the Iranians have never pursued the development of nuclear weapons. That truth was confirmed by the IAEA report after the nuke deal was signed by Obama in 2015—and was reinforced by the fact that the Iranians lived up to the strict letter of the deal until the Donald unilaterally cancelled it to please the Netanyahu fifth column in his inner circle.

Of course, the Donald had no affinity for a peaceful, non-interventionist foreign policy in the first place. His rap on the Forever Wars was just a way of dinging the foreign policy establishment which had first snubbed him to a man, woman and they; and was also a way of pitching his tiresome line that his predecessors were stupid dealmakers, not even remotely in his own self-vaunted league.

But the problem in the middle east and around the planet was not bad deals by prior presidents. The culprit is an imperialist foreign policy that drains the nation’s blood, treasure and moral authority for no good reason of homeland security.

So Trump’s Iranian fiasco was just another casualty of the kind of persistent “threat inflation” by the Deep State that keeps the fiscal gravy train flowing. In fact, a peaceful democracy would never maintain a $900 billion defense budget—more than the next 15 nation’s combined—unless its elected representatives had been endlessly marinated in false threats to the nation’s security.

That is, such as the trumped-up case that Iran was and is attempting to get the nuke or that it is the foremost state sponsor of terrorism merely because it was aligned with Shiite-based governments in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen and elsewhere. Stated differently, the only foreign policy Iran is allowed to have, apparently, is one that is vetted and approved by the Washington neocons.

The fact is, the real threat to peace in the region is the brutal economic sanctions on the Iranian economy imposed by the UniParty—first under the Trump Administration and then by Biden. These measures are causing immense hardships for the everyday Iranian people and amount to illegal international brigandage that blackens America’s good name.

But the Donald thinks that making economic war on a nation for no good reason is simply part of the “Art of the Deal” and that non-intervention is apparently just for wusses, traitors and clueless business people:

At the same time, the new administration unilaterally withdrew our crippling sanctions on Iran, foolishly giving away all of America’s leverage before negotiations have even begun. Leave the sanctions, negotiate. Does anybody understand what I’m saying here? Are there any good business people? You don’t have to be a good. Are there any bad business people? They took off of the sanctions. They took off the sanctions. They said, well, we’re going to not have any sanctions. Let’s negotiate a deal. I don’t know, Matt Schlapp, I don’t think you would have done that. Do you think so, Matt? I don’t think so. Mercedes wouldn’t have.

He also apparently thinks that his massive defense increases helped strengthen America’s homeland security. Not at all. They simply funded massive boondoggles for the military industrial complex that even the spenders on Capitol Hill had long resisted.

Stated differently, the Donald was about as lazy and ill-informed Commander-in-Chief as Washington has ever seen. He simply got bamboozled by the same old “readiness” and obsolete equipment canards that the Warfare State has been plying chief executives with since Ronald Reagan.

They weren’t true then, and they certainly are not valid now with the Soviet Union having long ago been swept into the dust bin of history. What the Donald did was simple pile another $250 billion per year of defense waste and excess on a national debt that is now utterly out of control:

And it means a strong military and taking care of our vets, but a strong military, which we have totally rebuilt, we have rebuilt it. And our military has never been stronger than it is today. It was tired, it was depleted, it was obsolete. And now we have the best brand-new equipment ever made and it was all produced right here in the USA. Isn’t that nice?

No, it is not nice at all. The total cost of defense, international affairs and veterans benefits is now a staggering $1.3 trillion per year. In constant dollars (FY 2023 $) that is 2.3X what the great Dwight Eisenhower thought was necessary to contain the Soviet Union at the peak of the Cold War, when he delivered his famous warning about the military-industrial complex in his 1961 Farewell Address.

At the end of the day, the Donald’s only real policy was the rank demagoguery about the hordes of alleged criminals pouring over the Mexican border–a theme that he stumbled upon when coming down the escalator of Trump Tower way back in June 2015.

But it was ugly nonsense then and remains so whenever he unloads more of the same rabid hysteria and about criminals, drug dealers and wards of mental institutions allegedly pouring across the border and threatening to “contaminate our blood”.

The truth, of course, is that 95% of the arrivals on the southern border are job seekers, who are forced to pretend that they are asylees because Washington to too stupid and dysfunctional to establish a proper large-scale Guest Worker program. The latter could be run in an orderly manner from the dozens of US embassies and consulates spread around Mexico and Latin America, not the banks of the Rio Grande and deserts of Arizona.

Indeed, the only criminals coming across the border are the brutal spawn of Washington’s demented war on drugs. So end the war on drugs and let the flowers and poppies bloom stateside. What will then line up at US consulates south of the border are powerfully motivated people looking for work.

And contrary to the Donald’s toxic immigrant bashing, America’s great capitalist prosperity was built on just that—the bent backs of foreigners looking for honest work and a better life.

So, was Donald J. Trump ever a real conservative hero?

No, not remotely. He was and remains just a self-promoting loud-mouth who had all the right enemies, but pursued all the wrong solutions and emitted a toxic patter that has set back the real conservative agenda irreparably.

Since the foolish remnant of the Grand Old Party has decided to roll the dice yet again anyway, we can thank out lucky stars for RFK’s courageous decision to pursue the presidency as a third-party candidate.

At the end of the day, only RFK can likely stop Trump in the Electoral College and send the election to the U.S. House of Representatives for the first time in 200 years. The latter seems like a dangerously long-shot way to save the Republic, but. alas, it’s the last best shot that remains.

Reprinted with permission from David Stockman’s Contra Corner.

The Best of David Stockman




This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.